0.11/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.11/0.15 % Command : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 1200 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 120 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 14:06:03 EDT 2021 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime : 0.15/0.36 % Number of cores: 8 0.15/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.15/0.36 # Version: 2.6rc1-ho 0.15/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied 0.15/0.37 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 23.57/23.76 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y 23.57/23.76 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred. 23.57/23.76 # 23.57/23.76 # Preprocessing time : 0.100 s 23.57/23.76 23.57/23.76 # Proof found! 23.57/23.76 # SZS status Theorem 23.57/23.76 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 23.57/23.76 thf(def_d_not, axiom, (d_not)=(^[X36:$o]:(X36=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_d_not)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_imp, axiom, (imp)=(^[X34:$o, X35:$o]:(X34=>X35)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_imp)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_all_of, axiom, (all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:![X4:$i]:(X3 @ X4=>X2 @ X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_all_of)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_is_of, axiom, (is_of)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:X2 @ X1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_is_of)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_non, axiom, (non)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(X2 @ X4=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_non)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_l_some, axiom, (l_some)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(![X480:$i]:(in @ X480 @ X1=>(X2 @ X480=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_l_some)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_n_is, axiom, (n_is)=(^[X556:$i, X557:$i]:(X556)=(X557)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_n_is)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_e_is, axiom, (e_is)=(^[X1:$i, X60:$i, X61:$i]:(X60)=(X61)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_e_is)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_n_some, axiom, (n_some)=(^[X558:$i > $o]:(![X559:$i]:(in @ X559 @ nat=>(X558 @ X559=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_n_some)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_diffprop, axiom, (diffprop)=(^[X1:$i, X183:$i, X4:$i]:(X1)=(n_pl @ X183 @ X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_diffprop)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_l_or, axiom, (l_or)=(^[X42:$o, X475:$o]:((X42=>~$true)=>X475)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_l_or)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_d_29_ii, axiom, (d_29_ii)=(^[X1:$i, X184:$i]:(![X580:$i]:(in @ X580 @ nat=>((X1)=(n_pl @ X184 @ X580)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_d_29_ii)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_moreis, axiom, (moreis)=(^[X1:$i, X187:$i]:(((![X587:$i]:(in @ X587 @ nat=>((X1)=(n_pl @ X187 @ X587)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true)=>(X1)=(X187))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_moreis)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_iii, axiom, (iii)=(^[X1:$i, X185:$i]:(![X583:$i]:(in @ X583 @ nat=>((X185)=(n_pl @ X1 @ X583)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_iii)). 23.57/23.76 thf(satz25a, axiom, all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:in @ X1 @ nat) @ (^[X1:$i]:all_of @ (^[X258:$i]:in @ X258 @ nat) @ (^[X259:$i]:(moreis @ X259 @ (ordsucc @ X1)<=d_29_ii @ X259 @ X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', satz25a)). 23.57/23.76 thf(def_lessis, axiom, (lessis)=(^[X1:$i, X188:$i]:(((![X588:$i]:(in @ X588 @ nat=>((X188)=(n_pl @ X1 @ X588)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true)=>(X1)=(X188))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_lessis)). 23.57/23.76 thf(satz25c, conjecture, all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:in @ X1 @ nat) @ (^[X1:$i]:all_of @ (^[X313:$i]:in @ X313 @ nat) @ (^[X314:$i]:(iii @ X314 @ X1=>lessis @ (ordsucc @ X314) @ X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', satz25c)). 23.57/23.76 thf(c_0_17, axiom, (d_not)=(^[X36:$o]:(X36=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_d_not, def_imp])). 23.57/23.76 thf(c_0_18, axiom, (all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:![X4:$i]:(X3 @ X4=>X2 @ X4)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_all_of, def_is_of])). 23.57/23.76 thf(c_0_19, axiom, (non)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(X2 @ X4=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_non, c_0_17])). 23.57/23.76 thf(c_0_20, axiom, (l_some)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(![X480:$i]:(in @ X480 @ X1=>(X2 @ X480=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_l_some, c_0_18]), c_0_17]), c_0_19])). 23.57/23.76 thf(c_0_21, axiom, (n_is)=(^[X556:$i, X557:$i]:(X556)=(X557)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_is, def_e_is])). 23.57/23.76 thf(c_0_22, axiom, (n_some)=(^[X558:$i > $o]:(![X559:$i]:(in @ X559 @ nat=>(X558 @ X559=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_some, c_0_20])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_23, axiom, (diffprop)=(^[X1:$i, X183:$i, X4:$i]:(X1)=(n_pl @ X183 @ X4)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_diffprop, c_0_21])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_24, axiom, (l_or)=(^[X42:$o, X475:$o]:((X42=>~$true)=>X475)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_l_or, def_imp]), c_0_17])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_25, axiom, (d_29_ii)=(^[X1:$i, X184:$i]:(![X580:$i]:(in @ X580 @ nat=>((X1)=(n_pl @ X184 @ X580)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_d_29_ii, c_0_22]), c_0_23])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_26, axiom, (moreis)=(^[X1:$i, X187:$i]:(((![X587:$i]:(in @ X587 @ nat=>((X1)=(n_pl @ X187 @ X587)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true)=>(X1)=(X187))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_moreis, c_0_24]), c_0_21]), c_0_25])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_27, axiom, (iii)=(^[X1:$i, X185:$i]:(![X583:$i]:(in @ X583 @ nat=>((X185)=(n_pl @ X1 @ X583)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_iii, c_0_22]), c_0_23])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_28, plain, ![X1720:$i]:(in @ X1720 @ nat=>![X1726:$i]:(in @ X1726 @ nat=>(~(![X1728:$i]:(in @ X1728 @ nat=>(X1726)!=(n_pl @ X1720 @ X1728)))=>(![X1727:$i]:(in @ X1727 @ nat=>(X1726)!=(n_pl @ (ordsucc @ X1720) @ X1727))=>(X1726)=(ordsucc @ X1720))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[satz25a, c_0_18]), c_0_25]), c_0_26])])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_29, axiom, (lessis)=(^[X1:$i, X188:$i]:(((![X588:$i]:(in @ X588 @ nat=>((X188)=(n_pl @ X1 @ X588)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true)=>(X1)=(X188))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_lessis, c_0_24]), c_0_21]), c_0_27])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_30, plain, ![X3132:$i, X3133:$i, X3134:$i]:((in @ (esk72_2 @ X3132 @ X3133) @ nat|(X3133)=(ordsucc @ X3132)|(~in @ X3134 @ nat|(X3133)!=(n_pl @ X3132 @ X3134))|~in @ X3133 @ nat|~in @ X3132 @ nat)&((X3133)=(n_pl @ (ordsucc @ X3132) @ (esk72_2 @ X3132 @ X3133))|(X3133)=(ordsucc @ X3132)|(~in @ X3134 @ nat|(X3133)!=(n_pl @ X3132 @ X3134))|~in @ X3133 @ nat|~in @ X3132 @ nat)), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_28])])])])])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ~(![X2319:$i]:(in @ X2319 @ nat=>![X2325:$i]:(in @ X2325 @ nat=>(~(![X2326:$i]:(in @ X2326 @ nat=>(X2319)!=(n_pl @ X2325 @ X2326)))=>(![X2327:$i]:(in @ X2327 @ nat=>(X2319)!=(n_pl @ (ordsucc @ X2325) @ X2327))=>(ordsucc @ X2325)=(X2319)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz25c]), c_0_18]), c_0_27]), c_0_29])])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_32, plain, ![X1:$i, X5:$i, X4:$i]:((X1)=(n_pl @ (ordsucc @ X4) @ (esk72_2 @ X4 @ X1))|(X1)=(ordsucc @ X4)|~in @ X5 @ nat|(X1)!=(n_pl @ X4 @ X5)|~in @ X1 @ nat|~in @ X4 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ![X3253:$i]:(in @ esk93_0 @ nat&(in @ esk94_0 @ nat&((in @ esk95_0 @ nat&(esk93_0)=(n_pl @ esk94_0 @ esk95_0))&((~in @ X3253 @ nat|(esk93_0)!=(n_pl @ (ordsucc @ esk94_0) @ X3253))&(ordsucc @ esk94_0)!=(esk93_0))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_31])])])])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_34, plain, ![X5:$i, X4:$i, X1:$i]:(in @ (esk72_2 @ X1 @ X4) @ nat|(X4)=(ordsucc @ X1)|~in @ X5 @ nat|(X4)!=(n_pl @ X1 @ X5)|~in @ X4 @ nat|~in @ X1 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_35, plain, ![X4:$i, X1:$i]:((n_pl @ (ordsucc @ X1) @ (esk72_2 @ X1 @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X4)))=(n_pl @ X1 @ X4)|(n_pl @ X1 @ X4)=(ordsucc @ X1)|~in @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X4) @ nat|~in @ X4 @ nat|~in @ X1 @ nat), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_32])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, (esk93_0)=(n_pl @ esk94_0 @ esk95_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, in @ esk93_0 @ nat, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, in @ esk95_0 @ nat, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, in @ esk94_0 @ nat, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, (ordsucc @ esk94_0)!=(esk93_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_41, plain, ![X4:$i, X1:$i]:((n_pl @ X1 @ X4)=(ordsucc @ X1)|in @ (esk72_2 @ X1 @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X4)) @ nat|~in @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X4) @ nat|~in @ X4 @ nat|~in @ X1 @ nat), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(~in @ X1 @ nat|(esk93_0)!=(n_pl @ (ordsucc @ esk94_0) @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, (n_pl @ (ordsucc @ esk94_0) @ (esk72_2 @ esk94_0 @ esk93_0))=(esk93_0), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_36]), c_0_37]), c_0_38]), c_0_39])]), c_0_40])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, in @ (esk72_2 @ esk94_0 @ esk93_0) @ nat, inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41, c_0_36]), c_0_37]), c_0_38]), c_0_39])]), c_0_40])). 23.57/23.77 thf(c_0_45, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42, c_0_43]), c_0_44])]), ['proof']). 23.57/23.77 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 23.57/23.77 # Proof object total steps : 46 23.57/23.77 # Proof object clause steps : 13 23.57/23.77 # Proof object formula steps : 33 23.57/23.77 # Proof object conjectures : 12 23.57/23.77 # Proof object clause conjectures : 9 23.57/23.77 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3 23.57/23.77 # Proof object initial clauses used : 8 23.57/23.77 # Proof object initial formulas used : 17 23.57/23.77 # Proof object generating inferences : 5 23.57/23.77 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 12 23.57/23.77 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 23.57/23.77 # Parsed axioms : 404 23.57/23.77 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 23.57/23.77 # Initial clauses : 639 23.57/23.77 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 169 23.57/23.77 # Initial clauses in saturation : 470 23.57/23.77 # Processed clauses : 16107 23.57/23.77 # ...of these trivial : 232 23.57/23.77 # ...subsumed : 9485 23.57/23.77 # ...remaining for further processing : 6390 23.57/23.77 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 149424 23.57/23.77 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 23.57/23.77 # Backward-subsumed : 56 23.57/23.77 # Backward-rewritten : 368 23.57/23.77 # Generated clauses : 1333720 23.57/23.77 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1169835 23.57/23.77 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1207 23.57/23.77 # Paramodulations : 1085388 23.57/23.77 # Factorizations : 2 23.57/23.77 # NegExts : 139 23.57/23.77 # Equation resolutions : 150124 23.57/23.77 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 23.57/23.77 # Propositional check models : 0 23.57/23.77 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 23.57/23.77 # Propositional clauses : 0 23.57/23.77 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 23.57/23.77 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 23.57/23.77 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 23.57/23.77 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 23.57/23.77 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 23.57/23.77 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 23.57/23.77 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 23.57/23.77 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 23.57/23.77 # Current number of processed clauses : 5908 23.57/23.77 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 326 23.57/23.77 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 23 23.57/23.77 # Negative unit clauses : 704 23.57/23.77 # Non-unit-clauses : 4855 23.57/23.77 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1152264 23.57/23.77 # ...number of literals in the above : 8584987 23.57/23.77 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 23.57/23.77 # Current number of archived clauses : 427 23.57/23.77 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7148538 23.57/23.77 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 745098 23.57/23.77 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5338 23.57/23.77 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 443986 23.57/23.77 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 225 23.57/23.77 # BW rewrite match attempts : 276 23.57/23.77 # BW rewrite match successes : 117 23.57/23.77 # Condensation attempts : 0 23.57/23.77 # Condensation successes : 0 23.57/23.77 # Termbank termtop insertions : 36127762 23.62/23.83 23.62/23.83 # ------------------------------------------------- 23.62/23.83 # User time : 22.767 s 23.62/23.83 # System time : 0.704 s 23.62/23.83 # Total time : 23.471 s 23.62/23.83 # Maximum resident set size: 2324 pages 23.62/23.83 EOF